A practically insignificant statistics blog
March 29, 2011 § Leave a comment
A very clear explanation for the lay. (I still think Silver moderately overfits as a matter of course, though.)
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
« You too can convince the BBC these things will become extinct, with increasing data, a logistic curve, and arXiv
Because I’m giving a talk on it: Birth order, baseball, and Simpson’s paradox reversed »
You are currently reading Nate Silver on overfitting at "But it's under .05!".
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.